Liability imposed on a parent as a result of the actions of their child is called?

The concept of liability imposed on a parent for the actions of their child is referred to as vicarious liability. This legal principle holds one party responsible for the actions of another based on their relationship. In this context, a parent can be held liable for the tortious acts of their minor child, particularly if those acts occur in the course of their responsibilities or under their supervision. Vicarious liability recognizes that parents have a certain level of control and responsibility over their children, thus extending the legal ramifications of the child's actions to the parent.

The other options describe different legal concepts. Absolute liability refers to a situation where a party is held liable without proving negligence or fault, often associated with inherently dangerous activities. Comparative negligence involves the allocation of fault between parties, leading to reduced damages based on the percentage of negligence attributable to each party. Strict liability generally applies in contexts where a party is held liable regardless of fault, typically in cases concerning defective products or hazardous activities, but does not encompass the actions of children in the same way that vicarious liability does. Understanding these distinctions clarifies the specific role of vicarious liability in the context of parent-child legal relationships.